Game Stories
dc.contributor.author | Rose, Carol | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:19.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:36:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:36:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/1728 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1774144 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/980 | |
dc.description.abstract | In any discussion of "Law-And-", the elephant in the room is Law and Economics ("L&E"). Economic analysis has had greater success than any other discipline as a colonizer of legal scholarship. The main contenders, Law and Society and Law and Humanities, are certainly robust in their own rights, but relative to L&E, these approaches are underweight, and their adherents have been known to seethe at the capacity of L&E scholars to smother practically every legal field in sight. In recent years, a number of L&E scholars have adopted a new tool, game theory, that expands their imperial claims even further. The simplest and best-known games in game theory are typically represented by a set of conventional stories. But that fact—that the games are represented by stories—makes these games a fair target for one branch of Law and Humanities scholarship, namely Law and Literature. | |
dc.title | Game Stories | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:36:44Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1728 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2749&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |