Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRose, Carol
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:19.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:36:44Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:36:44Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1728
dc.identifier.contextkey1774144
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/980
dc.description.abstractIn any discussion of "Law-And-", the elephant in the room is Law and Economics ("L&E"). Economic analysis has had greater success than any other discipline as a colonizer of legal scholarship. The main contenders, Law and Society and Law and Humanities, are certainly robust in their own rights, but relative to L&E, these approaches are underweight, and their adherents have been known to seethe at the capacity of L&E scholars to smother practically every legal field in sight. In recent years, a number of L&E scholars have adopted a new tool, game theory, that expands their imperial claims even further. The simplest and best-known games in game theory are typically represented by a set of conventional stories. But that fact—that the games are represented by stories—makes these games a fair target for one branch of Law and Humanities scholarship, namely Law and Literature.
dc.titleGame Stories
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:36:44Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1728
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2749&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Game_Stories.pdf
Size:
1.287Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record