Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacey, Jonathan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:18.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:36:30Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:36:30Z
dc.date.issued1993-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1651
dc.identifier.contextkey1761690
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/895
dc.description.abstractThe Federalist vision of representative democracy is a topic no less important today than it was in the days of the Framers. We all agree that we live in a representative democracy. Modem political practitioners, however, draw the wrong inferences from this fact. The Federalist vision of representative democracy should actually be treated as two separate inquiries. The first asks, "What do representatives do?" and the response is embodied by the opposing pluralist and Burkean paradigms of the representative's role. The second inquiry asks, "What is the role of democracy within our system of constitutional design?" and the response is that democracy should serve either to legitimize or to check government. The dominant contemporary response to these topics in the United States favors the idea that democracy serves a legitimizing function. That approach is ahistorical, inefficient, and intellectually impoverished.
dc.titleRepresentative Democracy
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:36:30Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1651
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2649&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Representative_Democracy.pdf
Size:
338.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record