Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLevitin, Adam J
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nancy S
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Christina L
dc.contributor.authorLinzer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMcCoy, Patricia A.
dc.contributor.authorMoringiello, Juliet M.
dc.contributor.authorRenuart, Elizabeth A
dc.contributor.authorWillis, Lauren E.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol36/iss1/7
dc.identifier.contextkey14377424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8287
dc.description.abstractProfessor Gregory Klass's replication study of the Draft Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contract's empirical analysis of privacy policies found troubling and pervasive problems with the Reporters' coding of cases. We extended Professor Klass's study with a replication of the coding of the two largest datasets supporting the Draft Restatement, those on the enforceability of unilateral contract modifications and those on the enforceability of clickwrap assent. For the replication, we reviewed 186 cases blind to the Reporters' coding.
dc.titleThe Faulty Foundation of the Draft Restatement of Consumer Contracts
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:46Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol36/iss1/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AdamJLevitinNancySKimChri.pdf
Size:
1.636Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record