Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorListwa, Daniel B.
dc.contributor.authorSeidell, Charles
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:43Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol35/iss2/7
dc.identifier.contextkey12811404
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8272
dc.description.abstractThis Note defends the SEC's statutory authority to seek judicial disgorgement. In Kokesh v. SEC, the Supreme Court held that judicial disgorgement brought by the SEC constitutes a penalty for the purpose of the five-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2462. In the following months, scholars and practitioners-and at least one putative class action-have argued that this opinion spells the end for judicial disgorgement.
dc.titlePenalties in Equity: Disgorgement after Kokesh v. SEC
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:43Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol35/iss2/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1523&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
DanielBListwaCharlesSeide.pdf
Size:
2.741Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record