Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFox, Merritt B.
dc.contributor.authorGlosten, Lawrence R.
dc.contributor.authorRauterberg, Gabriel V.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:41Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol35/iss1/2
dc.identifier.contextkey12811322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8260
dc.description.abstractMore than eighty years after federal law first addressed stock market manipulation, federal courts remain fractured by disagreement and confusion about manipulation law's most foundational questions. Only last year, plaintiffs petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve a sharp split among the federal circuits concerning manipulation law's central question: whether trading activity alone can ever be considered illegal manipulation under federal law. Academics have been similarly confused economists and legal scholars cannot agree on whether manipulation is possible in principle; let alone on how, if it is, to address it properly in practice.
dc.titleStock Market Manipulation and Its Regulation
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:41Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol35/iss1/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1510&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
MerrittBFoxLawrenceRGlost.pdf
Size:
3.595Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record