Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrinkerhoff Jr, John C.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol34/iss1/6
dc.identifier.contextkey10230441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8248
dc.description.abstractMany state antitrust statutes passed around the turn of the twentieth century contain language that ostensibly limits their jurisdiction to their state' s borders. Courts typically equate this language, as well as the jurisdictional limits of some early antitrust statutes without explicit limits, to the dormant Commerce Clause boundaries present during these statutes' enactment. However, courts disagree considerably on the historical limits of state antitrust jurisdiction and thus, promulgate a variety of standards that purportedly limit state antitrust statutes to their original scope.
dc.titleRopes of Sand: State Antitrust Statutes Bound by Their Original Scope
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:39Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol34/iss1/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1499&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Brinkerhoff_John.pdf
Size:
2.340Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record