Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTutt, Andrew
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:28Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol30/iss2/5
dc.identifier.contextkey8687986
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8186
dc.description.abstractThis Note argues that judges should invalidate terms in contracts of adhesion that place the risk of loss on the costlier cost-avoider or that grant an option to one of the parties to impose non-reciprocal costs on the other. It goes on to justify this rule, arguing that it minimizes both the primary and secondary costs of contracts of adhesion.
dc.titleOn the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:28Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol30/iss2/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1374&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
14_30YaleJonReg439_2013_.pdf
Size:
2.595Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record