Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsch, Peter
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:26Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:26Z
dc.date.issued1986-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol3/iss2/7
dc.identifier.contextkey8541561
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8172
dc.description.abstractIn their recent encomium to auto safety regulation, Joan Claybrook and David Bollier contend generally that: 1. Major lifesaving and injury-prevention gains have been achieved at a cost so modest that it hardly bears discussion; but 2. Regulation does not enjoy the popularity it deserves because of a "perceptual bias" under which its costs are clearly recognized while its gains are largely "hidden."
dc.titleAutomobile Safety: Is Government Regulation Really Our Savior?
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:26Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol3/iss2/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
17_3YaleJonReg383_1985_1986_.pdf
Size:
380.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record