Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolk, Peter
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:19Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol27/iss2/6
dc.identifier.contextkey8657573
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8128
dc.description.abstractThis Comment considers whether states and municipalities might benefit from altering prevailing practices regarding security interests and bond issues. After reviewing the primary methods of municipal bond financing and their current treatment by courts, the Comment argues for a broader use of municipal property as collateral for bonds, suggesting the typical connection between revenue stream and revenue source with revenue bonds be broken, and that property be attached to general obligation bonds. The Comment proceeds by exploring some policy implications related to its proposal and concludes that expanded power may be in municipalities' best interests.
dc.subjectBroadening the Use of Municipal Mortgages
dc.titleBroadening the Use of Municipal Mortgages
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:19Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol27/iss2/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1309&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
14_27YaleJonReg397_2010_.pdf
Size:
643.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record