Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHemel, Daniel
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:18Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol27/iss1/6
dc.identifier.contextkey8655094
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8122
dc.description.abstractThis Comment reviews recent proposals to address the "empty creditor" problem. The author argues that previous proposals would do little to reduce the risk that empty creditors will block debt-for-equity exchanges in order to collect credit default swap payments. The author presents an alternative approach that would limit the dangers of empty crediting by modifying the standardized language of swap agreements. Specifically, the author argues for widening the definition of "credit events" to encompass voluntary debt for- equity exchanges that surpass a certain participation threshold. This reform would benefit the vast majority of credit protection buyers and sellers, while simultaneously reducing deadweight losses resulting from unnecessary bankruptcy filings.
dc.titleEmpty Creditors and Debt Exchanges
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:18Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol27/iss1/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1303&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
07_27YaleJonReg159_2010_.pdf
Size:
714.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record