Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWright, Joshua
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:19.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:58:06Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol23/iss2/2
dc.identifier.contextkey8609269
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/8064
dc.description.abstractThe regulation of the competitive process for product distribution and promotion is an unsettled and incoherent area of antitrust law. Competition for distribution involves contracting activity regarding the decision to carry, promote, or place a particular product. This process includes business practices recently subject to intense antitrust scrutiny such as slotting allowances, discounts, bundled rebates, category management, and exclusive dealing. Antitrust law has designed rules for each of these practices independently, ignoring the economic relationships between these business practices. Focusing on the economics of the competitive process for distribution exposes an antitrust policy that systematically mishandles the regulation of these contracts. These economic insights suggest that per se legality for arrangements less than one year in duration or arrangements that foreclose less than 40% of total distribution would improve consumer welfare without significant risk of anticompetitive harm.
dc.titleAntitrust Law and Competition for Distribution
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:58:07Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol23/iss2/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10_23YaleJonReg169_2006_.pdf
Size:
2.434Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record