Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPenzer, Jason
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:18.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:57:35Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:57:35Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjreg/vol12/iss1/9
dc.identifier.contextkey8682199
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7920
dc.description.abstractThis Note examines the emergence of consumer-directed information disclosure proposals in the health care reform debate. By drawing on the literatures of cognitive psychology, marketing, and existing statutory information disclosure, the author discusses the drawbacks of relying on health care report cards as a quality assurance system. The author concludes that report cards cannot currently assure quality, given limitations in the state of the art of quality measurement and an inadequate understanding of how consumers would process disclosed information.
dc.titleGrading the Report Card: Lessons from Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, and the Law of Information Disclosure for Quality Assessment in Health Care Reform
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal on Regulation
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:57:35Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol12/iss1/9
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1360&context=yjreg&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
12_12YaleJonReg207_1995_.pdf
Size:
2.804Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record