Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROBERTS, ALEXANDRA
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:18.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:57:23Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2007-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjolt/vol9/iss1/7
dc.identifier.contextkey3010904
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7866
dc.description.abstractBrain Fingerprinting uses electroencephalography to ascertain the presence or absence of information in a subject's brain based on his reaction to particular stimuli. As a new forensic tool, Brain Fingerprinting technology stands poised to exert a tremendous impact on the presentation and outcome of selected legal cases in the near future. It also provides a fertile case study to examine the role of analogical reasoning in the process by which lawyers, experts, judges, and the media influence how fact-finders perceive and evaluate unfamiliar types of proof When juridical metaphor disguises, distorts, or destroys ideas, it ceases to serve as an aid to understanding and functions instead as an obstacle to knowledge. This Note explores the ways in which evidentiary analogy may insidiously shape how courts treat novel forms of scientific evidence.
dc.titleEVERYTHING NEW IS OLD AGAIN: BRAIN FINGERPRINTING AND EVIDENTIARY ANALOGY
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law and Technology
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:57:23Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjolt/vol9/iss1/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=yjolt&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
07_9YaleJL_Tech234_2006_2007_.pdf
Size:
2.611Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record