Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyres, Ian
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:36:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:36:09Z
dc.date.issued1990-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1544
dc.identifier.contextkey1749586
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/780
dc.description.abstractIn the last two decades, the theory of games has increasingly dominated microeconomic theory. Frank Fisher recently asserted that game theory has become "the premier fashionable tool of microtheorists": That ascendancy appears fairly complete. Bright young theorists today tend to think of every problem in game-theoretic terms .... Every department feels it needs at least one game theorist or at least one theorist who thinks in game-theoretic terms.... The field appears to be in an exciting stage of ferment. Seminars, economic journals, and Ph.D. dissertations are awash with game-theoretic models of economic phenomena. The marginalist revolution of Samuelson is quickly being supplanted by the strategic models of a new breed of game theorists.
dc.titlePlaying Games with the Law
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:36:09Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1544
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2543&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Playing_Games_with_the_Law.pdf
Size:
1.580Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record