Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaldron, Jeremy
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:15.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:56:29Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-08T12:11:45-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol5/iss2/11
dc.identifier.contextkey3948964
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7623
dc.description.abstractKent Greenawalt, Law and Objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. Pp. x, 288. $45.00. Is law objective? The question is oddly unsatisfactory-Objective in what sense? Objective compared with what?-and one is naturally curious to know why it is being asked. The best way to approach Kent Greenawalt's latest book is to begin with the accusations made against traditional legal reasoning by members of the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement. Legal reasoning has been called "indeterminate and contradictory" by CLS scholars: it "cannot resolve questions in an 'objective' manner," for it is "not a method or process that leads reasonable, competent and fair-minded people to particular results in particular cases."
dc.titleAssurances of Objectivity
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:56:29Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol5/iss2/11
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
27b_5YaleJL_Human531_1993_.pdf
Size:
972.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record