Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Annaleigh E.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:14.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:56:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:56:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-16T09:03:09-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol29/iss2/5
dc.identifier.contextkey12845809
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7545
dc.description.abstractHow universities should deal with campus sexual assault is thorny and divisive, perhaps more so than any other current topic in the academy. Title IX is at the center of the debate on this issue, particularly following the issuance of the "Dear Colleague Letter" ("DCL") by the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights ("OCR") in 2011.1 The DCL made it clear that sexual assault and harassment are a form of sex discrimination proscribed by Title IX and outlined some necessary features of the adjudication of these issues. Beyond its formal requirements, the DCL made clear that OCR was going to dedicate more attention to the issue.
dc.titleDue Process Demands as Propaganda: The Rhetoric of Title IX Opposition
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:56:12Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol29/iss2/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1462&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AnnaleighECurtisDueProces.pdf
Size:
948.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record