Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinai, Yuval
dc.contributor.authorShmueli, Benjamin
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:14.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:56:03Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-18T11:22:10-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol26/iss1/2
dc.identifier.contextkey7736209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7506
dc.description.abstractThis Article's main argument is that the roots of contemporary utilitarian analysis can be traced back to Jewish law sources, and that the ancient model can assist us in presenting a preliminary sketch of a modern model of pluralistic tort liability. Is it possible to create a virtual encounter and dialogue between two methods: the method of classic scholars of the economic analysis of tort law, such as Guido Calabresi-one of the founders of (tort) law and economics-and the method of Jewish tort law scholars, such as Talmudic sages and post-Talmudic decisors (Poskim), especially the "Great Eagle," Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon (Maimonides)?
dc.titleCalabresi's and Maimonides's Tort Law Theories-A Comparative Analysis and a Preliminary Sketch of a Modern Model of Differential Pluralistic Tort Liability Based on the Two Theories
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:56:03Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol26/iss1/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1415&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Sinai.pdf
Size:
4.262Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record