Calabresi's and Maimonides's Tort Law Theories-A Comparative Analysis and a Preliminary Sketch of a Modern Model of Differential Pluralistic Tort Liability Based on the Two Theories
| dc.contributor.author | Sinai, Yuval | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shmueli, Benjamin | |
| dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:35:14.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:56:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:56:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-10-18T11:22:10-07:00 | |
| dc.identifier | yjlh/vol26/iss1/2 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 7736209 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7506 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This Article's main argument is that the roots of contemporary utilitarian analysis can be traced back to Jewish law sources, and that the ancient model can assist us in presenting a preliminary sketch of a modern model of pluralistic tort liability. Is it possible to create a virtual encounter and dialogue between two methods: the method of classic scholars of the economic analysis of tort law, such as Guido Calabresi-one of the founders of (tort) law and economics-and the method of Jewish tort law scholars, such as Talmudic sages and post-Talmudic decisors (Poskim), especially the "Great Eagle," Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon (Maimonides)? | |
| dc.title | Calabresi's and Maimonides's Tort Law Theories-A Comparative Analysis and a Preliminary Sketch of a Modern Model of Differential Pluralistic Tort Liability Based on the Two Theories | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:56:03Z | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol26/iss1/2 | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1415&context=yjlh&unstamped=1 |
