Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGenn, Hazel
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:13.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:55:56Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-08T12:36:46-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol24/iss1/18
dc.identifier.contextkey4116944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7477
dc.description.abstractThis Essay focuses on current civil justice policy in England and Wales and argues that, as a result of trends over the last fifteen years, the value of a public civil justice system is being challenged, while access to that system is being inhibited by both new procedural and funding measures. Accompanied by a profound change in civil justice discourse, the relevant interdependent justice policy strands involve the promotion of mediation and the withdrawal of the state from civil disputes; the removal of legal aid from most non-criminal issues; and a reduction in resources for the courts with fewer full-time judges.
dc.titleWhat Is Civil Justice For? Reform, ADR, and Access to Justice
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:55:57Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol24/iss1/18
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1392&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20_24YaleJL_Human397_2012_.pdf
Size:
1.243Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record