Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpaulding, Norman
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:13.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:55:56Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-08T12:36:44-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol24/iss1/16
dc.identifier.contextkey4116933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7475
dc.description.abstractTheories of justice have not had much to say about the space in which it is administered. Renderings of justice are almost entirely conceptual. In political theory, abstractions about the state of nature (an imagined condition in imaginary time) are followed by abstractions about consent, sovereignty, and just distribution that reduce agreement to implication, authority to inference, and equality to deferred expectation. In moral philosophy, exhortations about right action are offered in concededly metaphysical (which is to say, atemporal, disembodied) terms. And beyond the question of jurisdiction, which sovereignty implies, and the right of exclusion, which private property entails, precious little is said in legal theory about the relationship between justice and the space in which it operates.
dc.titleThe Enclosure of Justice: Courthouse Architecture, Due Process, and the Dead Metaphor of Trial
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:55:56Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol24/iss1/16
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1390&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
18_24YaleJL_Human311_2012_.pdf
Size:
2.245Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record