Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRose, Carol
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:13.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:55:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:55:52Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-08T12:36:09-07:00
dc.identifieryjlh/vol22/iss2/6
dc.identifier.contextkey4116644
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7457
dc.description.abstractIn any discussion of "Law-And-", the elephant in the room is Law and Economics ("L&E"). Economic analysis has had greater success than any other discipline as a colonizer of legal scholarship. The main contenders, Law and Society and Law and Humanities, are certainly robust in their own rights, but relative to L&E, these approaches are underweight, and their adherents have been known to seethe at the capacity of L&E scholars to smother practically every legal field in sight. In recent years, a number of L&E scholars have adopted a new tool, game theory, that expands their imperial claims even further. The simplest and best-known games in game theory are typically represented by a set of conventional stories. But that fact-that the games are represented by stories-makes these games a fair target for one branch of Law and Humanities scholarship, namely Law and Literature.
dc.titleGame Stories
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & the Humanities
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:55:52Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol22/iss2/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1364&context=yjlh&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
15_22YaleJL_Human369_2010_.pdf
Size:
1.279Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record