Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyres, Ian
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:36:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:36:00Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1496
dc.identifier.citationIan Ayres, Narrow tailoring, 43 UCLA L. REV. 1781 (1995).
dc.identifier.contextkey1744994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/726
dc.description.abstractSince the Supreme Court announced in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena that federal affirmative action programs will be subject to "strict scrutiny," a debate has reemerged over what constitutes a compelling government interest for classifications that favor traditionally disadvantaged races. This Essay, however, does not address this interesting and vital issue. It instead focuses on the second prong of strict scrutiny analysis: the requirement that racial classifications "must be narrowly tailored" to further the compelling government interest at stake.
dc.titleNarrow Tailoring
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:36:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1496
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2499&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Narrow_Tailoring.pdf
Size:
1.006Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record