Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBouadi, Sumaya H.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:10.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:54:51Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-18T09:10:24-07:00
dc.identifieryjlf/vol33/iss1/4
dc.identifier.contextkey24379986
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7140
dc.description.abstractAfter the forced separation of Indian families, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to create heightened procedural protections to maintain and preserve Indian families. Following Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637 (2013), courts have indicated concern that the heightened standards of ICWA may be overbroad and harm Indian children. This Note provides an empirical counter to that concern, illustrating that, under similar circumstances, Alaska Native parental survivors of domestic violence lose custody of their children at considerably higher rates than non-Alaska Natives. The continued disparate treatment suggests that ICWA continues to serve an important purpose in protecting Indian families and ought to be strengthened.
dc.titleDomestic Violence, the Indian Child Welfare Act, and Alaska Natives: How Domestic Violence is Weaponized Against Alaska Native Survivors
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & Feminism
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:54:51Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol33/iss1/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1412&context=yjlf&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bouadi_Print.pdf
Size:
1.843Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record