Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGann, Kelsey
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:10.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:54:47Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:54:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-09T09:07:51-08:00
dc.identifieryjlf/vol30/iss1/4
dc.identifier.contextkey13988399
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7115
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court of the United States is not known as a bastion of feminism. With only four female justices in its history, it can hardly even be considered an equitably staffed institution. However, for centuries, women have had to look to the Supreme Court to protect and define their rights - right to work, right to equal treatment, right to reproductive freedom. While the Court has been articulating women's rights, it has failed at using the language of feminism, the language of women, to define and support them.
dc.titleWhere Words Can Do Work: Language of Feminism in Whole Woman's Health
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & Feminism
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:54:47Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol30/iss1/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1386&context=yjlf&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
KelseyGannWhereWordsCanDo.pdf
Size:
1.268Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record