Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAppleton, Susan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:54:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:54:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-07T13:09:25-07:00
dc.identifieryjlf/vol28/iss1/1
dc.identifier.contextkey9990513
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7076
dc.description.abstractRecent Supreme Court rulings on marriage equality and religious objections to contraception have obscured the legacy of Eisenstadt v. Baird, the 1972 case that promised to change the course of family law. In extending constitutional protection to unmarried persons' access to birth control, Eisenstadt heralded a new family law that would be more inclusive, liberatory, sex-positive, and feminist than its predecessors. Although several forward-looking shifts in family law can trace their roots to this case and it lives on in today's jurisprudence, Eisenstadt's full transformative potential has been forgotten, if not co-opted, in service of a narrow and largely traditional agenda.
dc.titleThe Forgotten Family Law of Eisenstadt v. Baird
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & Feminism
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:54:40Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol28/iss1/1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1362&context=yjlf&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Susan_Frelich_Appletont.pdf
Size:
3.346Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record