Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatsumura, Kaiponanea
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:54:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:54:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-16T11:31:51-08:00
dc.identifieryjlf/vol25/iss1/5
dc.identifier.contextkey8157144
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/7055
dc.description.abstractDecisions like the one to bear or beget a child, to enter into or disentangle oneself from a long-term relationship or marriage, or to allocate resources and duties within a family unit are often treated as core choices constitutive of a person's identity. But many of these individually constitutive decisions necessarily involve the cooperation of others. One might therefore suspect that contract law-which operates to fix parties' mutual commitments-would be a useful tool for securing greater certainty regarding these important decisions. Nevertheless, courts have often refused to enforce agreements between intimates concerning such decisions on the grounds that they violate public policy. This Article criticizes the use of the public policy doctrine to avoid enforcement of intimate agreements.
dc.titlePublic Policing of Intimate Agreements
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & Feminism
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:54:37Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol25/iss1/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1339&context=yjlf&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
07_25YaleJL_Feminism159_2013_2 ...
Size:
3.600Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record