Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHo, Grace
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:54:27Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:54:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-22T07:30:26-08:00
dc.identifieryjlf/vol20/iss1/5
dc.identifier.contextkey8038248
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6996
dc.description.abstractWhen particular social groups attempt to challenge social norms through legal reform, they generate transformative law. Transformative law, according to legal scholar Linda Hamilton Krieger, emerges when a reformist group seeks to harness the power of law to advance its program of normative and institutional change. If transformative laws are to impact social norms in a substantive way, however, the reformist influences underlying the laws must predominate throughout the process of implementation. If legal changes intended to displace pre-existing norms, social meanings, and institutional practices serve to subtly reassert these pre-existing norms in a formalized legal regime, their transformative potential is undermined. Krieger describes the resulting socio-legal capture of legal reforms as the antithesis of transformative law.
dc.titleNot Quite Rights: How the Unwelcomeness Element in Sexual Harassment Law Undermines Title VII's Transformative Potential
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Law & Feminism
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:54:27Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlf/vol20/iss1/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1280&context=yjlf&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
06_20YaleJL_Feminism131_2008_2 ...
Size:
1.841Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record