International and Foreign Law North of the Border: The Canadian Experience

dc.contributor.author	Days, Drew
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:34:17.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:35:54Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:35:54Z
dc.date.issued	2007-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier	fss_papers/1464
dc.identifier.citation	Drew Days, International and Foreign Law North of the Border: The Canadian Experience, (2007).
dc.identifier.contextkey	1744827
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/691
dc.description.abstract	The question of the extent to which American judges should consult foreign and international authorities has occupied Supreme Court Justices, members of Congress and legal commentators for the past several years. This is evident in the opposing positions of the Justices in recent decisions on capital punishment and homosexual sodomy. The question has also spawned a public debate between two Supreme Court Justices, as well as congressional proposals explicitly permitting federal judges to consult only domestic sources.
dc.title	International and Foreign Law North of the Border: The Canadian Experience
dc.source.journaltitle	Faculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:35:54Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1464
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2493&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1

Name:

International_and_Foreign_Law_ ...

Size:

567.5Kb

Format:

PDF