Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvon Mehren, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:57Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:57Z
dc.date.issued1983-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol9/iss2/5
dc.identifier.contextkey9267348
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6817
dc.description.abstractThe process of arbitration is often chosen by parties to resolve disputes arising in international commerce because it permits them to resolve differences in a neutral setting outside the domestic legal system of any particular country. As neither party to an international commercial agreement wishes to be at a disadvantage if a dispute arises with respect to that agreement, arbitration, whether on an ad hoc basis or through an international arbitration institution such as the Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), or the World Arbitration Institute associated with the American Arbitration Association (AAA), offers the opportunity to resolve the controversy in a setting that the parties believe will be fair to both sides. Moreover, arbitration proceedings are often more flexible, less expensive and less time-consuming than ordinary litigation.
dc.titleThe Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under Conventions and United States Law
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:57Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol9/iss2/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1243&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20_9YaleJWorldPubOrd343_1982_1 ...
Size:
1.550Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record