Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArsanjani, Mahnoush
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:52Z
dc.date.issued1981-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol7/iss2/2
dc.identifier.contextkey9240441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6781
dc.description.abstractIt is a general principle of law, whatever the community, that a legal entity is responsible for the proximate injuries its acts may cause. The principle is fundamental in the regulation of private entities, and jurisprudence exhibits a clear trend toward the increasing subjection of governments to this same rule of law. In international law, the principle has long been expressed and applied in the doctrine of "State responsibility." There appears to be no cogent reason for suspending the operation of this policy with regard to acts of international organizations (IOs).
dc.titleClaims Against International Organizations: Quis custodiet isos custodes
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:52Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol7/iss2/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
12_7YaleJWorldPubOrd131_1980_1 ...
Size:
3.012Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record