Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBradlow, Adam H.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:43Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol43/iss2/4
dc.identifier.contextkey12902343
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6728
dc.description.abstractCan private parties use Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms to systematically advance human rights? For at least two decades now, we have known the inverse is possible: private companies can use ISDS mechanisms to stymie human rights. That is the lesson of Ethyl Corporation's 1997 claim challenging a Canadian import ban on the gasoline additive methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT).
dc.titleHuman Rights Impact Litigation in ISDS: A Proposal for Enabling Private Parties to Bring Human Rights Claims through Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:43Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol43/iss2/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1692&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AdamHBradlowHumanRightsIm.pdf
Size:
2.595Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record