Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacey, Jonathan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:50Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:50Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1445
dc.identifier.contextkey1736866
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/670
dc.description.abstractOne of the reasons that James W. Ely's recent book, The Chief Justiceship of Melville W. Fuller, 1888-1910, is an important contribution to political theory, as well as to the history of the Supreme Court, is that it provides an important lens through which to view the Court at a time when it played a much different role in American life than it does today. In particular, the Fuller Court played active roles in protecting property rights and in fostering commerce, while the modern Court has largely abdicated its historical obligations in these regards. It is important to ponder what motivated the Fuller Court because its jurisprudence raises issues that have special relevance today.
dc.titlePublic Choice, Public Opinion, and the Fuller Court
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:51Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1445
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2442&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Public_Choice__Public_Opinion_ ...
Size:
463.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record