Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Shouvik
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:32Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:32Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol38/iss2/6
dc.identifier.contextkey9339217
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6660
dc.description.abstractIn Passage Through the Great Belt, Finland requested the International Court of Justice to issue provisional measures preventing Denmark from constructing a bridge that could lead to an abridgment of Finnish ships' rights of free passage through the Great Belt. The ICJ denied Finland's request for interim orders, and in so doing made a pointed note that "in principle ... if it is established that the construction of works involves an infringement of a legal right, the possibility cannot and should not be excluded a priori of a judicial finding that such works must not be continued or must be modified or dismantled." Twenty years later, this statement would be institutionalized as "a principle of international law" in an arbitration proceeding between India and Pakistan.
dc.title"Proceeding at Your Own Risk": Evaluating a New Principle of International Law for Provisional Measures
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:33Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol38/iss2/6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1435&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
16_38YaleJIntlL511_2013_.pdf
Size:
849.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record