Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFontana, David
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:26Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:26Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol36/iss1/2
dc.identifier.contextkey9334568
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6619
dc.description.abstractThere have been four confirmation hearings in the United States Senate for nominees to the Supreme Court since 2004-first, for John Roberts to be the new Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 2005, and then for Samuel Alito in 2006, Sonia Sotomayor in 2009, and Elena Kagan in 2010 to be Associate Justices. Each nominee faced hundreds of questions from a range of senators on a range of different constitutional issues. Among the thousands of questions asked in these four different Senate confirmation hearings, there were only a few issues that were raised in each of the four. One such issue was the role of comparative constitutional law in the American constitutional system.
dc.titleThe Rise and Fall of Comparative Constitutional Law in the Postwar Era
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:26Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol36/iss1/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1394&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
03_36YaleJIntlL1_2011_.pdf
Size:
3.689Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record