Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaters, Melissa
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:16Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:16Z
dc.date.issued2007-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol32/iss2/8
dc.identifier.contextkey9299950
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6557
dc.description.abstractOne of the great legacies of the New Haven School was its early recognition of the tremendous dynamism and complexity of the international lawmaking process. Its proponents wisely rejected both Austinian positivism and the traditional conception of "law" as a dichotomy of "national" and "international" legal rules. Instead, the policy-oriented jurisprudence of the New Haven School recognized and embraced the interactivity of a multiplicity of decisionmakers in shaping the international legal regime. Moreover, in defining law as an iterative process of authoritative decisionmaking, the New Haven School recognized that authoritative decisions need not necessarily come from official bodies such as courts, tribunals, or legislatures. Instead, its proponents argued, international law should be understood as a policymaking process in which the fundamental values of the international community help to define the content of, and to legitimate, international legal rules.
dc.titleNormativity in the "New" Schools: Assessing the Legitimacy of International Legal Norms Created by Domestic Courts
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:16Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol32/iss2/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1303&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
18_32YaleJIntlL455_2007_.pdf
Size:
2.044Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record