Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinickoff, David
dc.contributor.authorJasanoff, Sheila
dc.contributor.authorBusch, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorGrove-White, Robin
dc.contributor.authorWynne, Brian
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:08Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol30/iss1/3
dc.identifier.contextkey9283834
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6506
dc.description.abstractIn August 2003, the United States, Canada, and Argentina initiated dispute settlement procedures at the World Trade Organization (WTO) against the European Communities (EC) for delaying approvals of genetically modified (GM) crops within its borders. A dispute settlement panel has convened to settle this matter, European Communities-Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (Biotech Products), and the parties began submitting written complaints in May 2004. The dispute implicates not only technical concerns about barriers to trade but also political questions about democratic participation in the design and operation of the WTO. Its resolution will have consequences for the global development of agricultural biotechnology, the democratic regulation of risks in world trade, and, not least, the WTO's very legitimacy as an institution of global governance.
dc.titleAdjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:08Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol30/iss1/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
06_30YaleJIntlL81_2005_.pdf
Size:
3.045Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record