• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Yale
    • Yale Journal of International Law
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Yale
    • Yale Journal of International Law
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of openYLSCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Foreword

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    11_29YaleJIntlL291_2004_.pdf
    Size:
    174.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6488
    Abstract
    While debates over jus ad bellum-the principles governing the lawfulness of states' resort to the use of force-have raged for centuries, state action in the latter part of the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century has raised important new questions, challenging what many states and international law commentators formerly viewed as established public international law on the use of force. For example, the 1990s witnessed an important evolution in the justification for the resort to use of force in the Balkans, where massive human rights violations formed the basis for armed interventions by coalitions of states. Indeed, even in the face of seemingly contradictory procedural requirements in the U.N. Charter that required U.N. Security Council action before force could be applied in Serbia, when the Council became deadlocked, a coalition of states nevertheless decided to intervene, provoking a firestorm of argument in international legal circles over the legality of such interventions. A similar controversy developed around the 2003 U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, which coincided with the Bush administration's announcement of a new doctrine of pre-emptive force, justified in certain circumstances by reasons of national security.
    Collections
    Yale Journal of International Law

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.