Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, Joan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol27/iss2/8
dc.identifier.contextkey9249185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6454
dc.description.abstractThe Judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the LaGrand case has not to date resulted in a discernible improvement in United States compliance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.2 The gross deficiencies of U.S. practice regarding consular access under Article 36 of the Convention are a sad but telling reflection of the unreality of international law in the United States today. The lessons from LaGrand are varied and important.
dc.titleThe Unreality of International Law in the United States and the LaGrand Case
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol27/iss2/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20_27YaleJIntlL427_Summer2002_.pdf
Size:
444.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record