Show simple item record

dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol27/iss2/7
dc.identifier.contextkey9249176
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6453
dc.description.abstractThe decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the LaGrand Case signals a significant shift in the interpretation of the ICJ's injunctive authority that is likely to impact the future work of international courts and tribunals. For the first time, the ICJ clearly states that provisional orders it issues under Article 41 of the ICJ Statute have binding effect, and that parties have a legal obligation to adhere to such orders. What has helped LaGrand become a prime topic for international legal discourse, however, is the intertwining of this structural change with another highly controversial issue in international law-that of capital punishment.
dc.titleSymposium: Reflections on the ICJ's LaGrand Decision - Foreword
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:53:00Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol27/iss2/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19_27YaleJIntlL423_Summer2002_.pdf
Size:
240.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record