Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRose, Thomas
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:52:58Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:52:58Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol27/iss1/7
dc.identifier.contextkey9249046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6441
dc.description.abstractHistorically, extradition has been a reflection of, and an exercise in, the supremacy of the state over the individual A fugitive is by definition an affront to that supremacy, for such a person embodies the inability of the state to hold accountable someone who ostensibly has broken its legal code. Without prosecution there is criminal impunity, and that is seen as a direct challenge to the authority and sovereign duty of the state to protect its citizens. An extradition treaty provides a way to meet this challenge by giving states a mechanism to apprehend each other's fugitives.
dc.titleA Delicate Balance: Extradition, Sovereignty, and Individual Rights in the United States and Canada
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:52:58Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol27/iss1/7
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1173&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
11_27YaleJIntlL193_Winter2002_.pdf
Size:
1.678Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record