Smith v. Van Gorkom: Insights About C.E.O.s, Corporate Law Rules, and the Jurisdictional Competition for Corporate Charter

dc.contributor.author	Macey, Jonathan
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:34:16.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.date.issued	2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifier	fss_papers/1415
dc.identifier.citation	Jonathan R Macey, Smith v. Van Gorkom: Insights About CEOs, Corporate Law Rules, and the Jurisdictional Competition for Corporate Charters, 96 NW. UL REV. 607 (2001).
dc.identifier.contextkey	1728725
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/637
dc.description.abstract	After fifteen years, Smith v. Van Gorkom remains intellectually frustrating. The annoyance stems from the fact that, while the decision may have dramatically improved the quality of deliberations in corporate boardrooms, the imposition of liability on the defendants in the case seems profoundly unjust.
dc.title	Smith v. Van Gorkom: Insights About C.E.O.s, Corporate Law Rules, and the Jurisdictional Competition for Corporate Charter
dc.source.journaltitle	Faculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1415
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2423&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1

Name:

Smith_v._Van_Gorkom__Insights_ ...

Size:

1.518Mb

Format:

PDF