Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacey, Jonathan
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1415
dc.identifier.citationJonathan R Macey, Smith v. Van Gorkom: Insights About CEOs, Corporate Law Rules, and the Jurisdictional Competition for Corporate Charters, 96 NW. UL REV. 607 (2001).
dc.identifier.contextkey1728725
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/637
dc.description.abstractAfter fifteen years, Smith v. Van Gorkom remains intellectually frustrating. The annoyance stems from the fact that, while the decision may have dramatically improved the quality of deliberations in corporate boardrooms, the imposition of liability on the defendants in the case seems profoundly unjust.
dc.titleSmith v. Van Gorkom: Insights About C.E.O.s, Corporate Law Rules, and the Jurisdictional Competition for Corporate Charter
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:45Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1415
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2423&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Smith_v._Van_Gorkom__Insights_ ...
Size:
1.518Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record