Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenson, Todd
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:03.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:52:44Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:52:44Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol21/iss1/5
dc.identifier.contextkey9205494
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6356
dc.description.abstractThis article deals with the legal intricacies of taking security (which in this case means the ability of one party to obtain an enforceable interest in the property of another in order to secure the performance of an obligation) as well as describing how this system functions within the Chinese legal system as a whole. The section on the Chinese legal system forms the background into which the remainder of the article fits. The main issues are the primacy of policy and the historical and cultural influences which shape Chinese law. The article then deals with the creation of a security interest in China. The law consists of not only formal published laws and regulations, but also a practical element, the law in practice. Next, the article deals with enforcing security interests against debtors, third parties, and the government. The issues of self help, informal methods, and finally formal methods are all discussed. Finally, the article deals with the issue of liquidating the security.
dc.titleTaking Security in China: Approaching U.S. Practices?
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:52:44Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol21/iss1/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
09_21YaleJIntlL183_1996_.pdf
Size:
3.222Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record