Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanzman, Edward
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:02.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:52:16Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:52:16Z
dc.date.issued1988-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol13/iss1/4
dc.identifier.contextkey9365325
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6190
dc.description.abstractThe Reagan Administration considers verifiability of Soviet compliance to be an essential feature of any arms control agreement it would be willing to make with the Soviet Union. While numerous methods of arms control verification exist, on-site inspections might be a means of ensuring that all parties are strictly observing the provisions of an agreement. As a result, Reagan Administration arms control negotiators have pressed the Soviets to agree to on-site inspections in several of the agreements under discussion. In addition to the Soviet Union's historical opposition to on-site inspection, based in part upon fears of espionage, the U.S. Constitution's limitations on governmental power are also potential obstacles to on-site inspection in this country. The purpose of this article is to examine the constitutionality of on-site inspections as contained in one of these agreements-the Draft Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (Draft Convention).
dc.titleConstitutionality of Warrantless On-Site Arms Control Inspections in the United States
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:52:16Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol13/iss1/4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1515&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
07_13YaleJIntlL21_1988_.pdf
Size:
3.088Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record