Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKreisberg, Paul
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:02.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:52:12Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:52:12Z
dc.date.issued1986-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol11/iss2/8
dc.identifier.contextkey9357019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6166
dc.description.abstractState Department and other U.S. officials involved in consular activities, technical negotiations, and economic programs represent the majority of the American civilian, non-intelligence foreign policy establishment. Many would be puzzled by the question posed in this essay. International agreements, understandings, and conventions represent the daily grist and foundation of their work. These agreements, such as those on the rights of American citizens abroad, international trade, criminal extradition, and scientific cooperation, embody the corpus of customary law and mutually agreed-upon arrangements through which affairs among nations are ordinarily conducted. The behavior regulated by these arrangements actually represents the heart of day-to-day international activity below the "high politics" that attracts media attention.
dc.titleDoes the U.S. Government Think That International Law Is Important?
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:52:12Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol11/iss2/8
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1488&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
25_11YaleJIntlL479_Spring1986_.pdf
Size:
859.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record