Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNino, Carlos
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:01.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:52:08Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:52:08Z
dc.date.issued1985-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifieryjil/vol11/iss1/11
dc.identifier.contextkey9346646
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6144
dc.description.abstractA recent issue of The Yale Journal of International Law featured an article offering a critique of the current prosecution of human rights violations in Argentina.I The authors of this piece are a courageous human rights lawyer and active member of the Peronist Party, Emilio Mignone, and two able North American attorneys, Cynthia L. Estlund and Samuel Issacharoff. The article constitutes a valuable contribution to the discussion of the legal and moral implications of the prosecution of past human rights violations in Argentina. However, the article fails to give an impartial perspective on the issues under consideration and commits several errors, thus distorting the aims of the present constitutional government with respect to these prosecutions. The authors also isolate these aims from the general context of the government's human rights policy. While impartiality is often difficult with regard to such emotional issues, the reader may achieve a more balanced view if these issues are presented from a different perspective.
dc.titleThe Human Rights Policy of the Argentine Constitutional Government: A Reply
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of International Law
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:52:09Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol11/iss1/11
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1476&context=yjil&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
14_11YaleJIntlL217_Fall1985_.pdf
Size:
868.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record