Do We Still Need a Federal Patients' Bill of Rights?

dc.contributor.author	Law, Sylvia
dc.date	2021-11-25T13:35:00.000
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-26T11:51:43Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-26T11:51:43Z
dc.date.issued	2013-02-23T19:45:38-08:00
dc.identifier	yjhple/vol3/iss1/1
dc.identifier.contextkey	3771501
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5990
dc.description.abstract	Since 1997, proposals for a federal patients' bill of rights have enjoyed strong, bipartisan political support, from Congress, presidential candidates, and the two major political parties in their party platforms. Despite widespread approval, nothing has been adopted, and, furthermore, nothing has even come close. This Article examines developments in markets, state law, and federal court decisions that attest to the continued need for a federal patients' bill of rights.
dc.title	Do We Still Need a Federal Patients' Bill of Rights?
dc.source.journaltitle	Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
refterms.dateFOA	2021-11-26T11:51:43Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol3/iss1/1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext	https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=yjhple&unstamped=1

Name:

05_3YaleJHealthPolyL_Ethics1_2 ...

Size:

1.988Mb

Format:

PDF