Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJasukaitis, Margo
dc.contributor.authorO’Hara, Daniel
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:51:38Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:51:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-02T12:34:29-07:00
dc.identifieryjhple/vol19/iss2/5
dc.identifier.contextkey19223121
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5963
dc.description.abstractMillions of American workers purchase “regular occupation” disability insurance to protect against disability-related job loss. Unlike general disability insurance policies, which require workers be disabled from doing any job to receive benefit payments, “regular occupation” insurance pays benefits when workers become disabled from doing their specific job. Whether a disabled worker receives benefits under such a plan often turns on how insurers and courts define the worker’s “regular occupation.”
dc.titleDefining “Regular Occupation” in Long-Term Disability Insurance Policies
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:51:39Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol19/iss2/5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=yjhple&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Jasukaitis_v19n2_210_233.pdf
Size:
359.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record