Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalle, Brian
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:51:36Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-22T09:47:35-08:00
dc.identifieryjhple/vol18/iss1/1
dc.identifier.contextkey13876838
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5948
dc.description.abstract"Externalities," or harms to others, provide a standard justification for government intervention in the private market. There is less agreement over whether government is justified in correcting "internalities," or harms we inflict on our own health or well-being. While some of the internality dispute is philosophical, some is practical. Critics suggest government lacks information to regulate internalities, and that any intervention would inefficiently distort a private market for self-help. This Article argues that these critiques of regulation overlook well-established tools of externality regulation, as well as a burgeoning literature on the measurement of internalities.
dc.titleThe Problem of Intra-Personal Cost
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:51:36Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol18/iss1/1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1259&context=yjhple&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Galle_Preprint.pdf
Size:
757.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record