Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Jeffrey
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:59.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:51:33Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:51:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-07T12:19:02-07:00
dc.identifieryjhple/vol15/iss2/3
dc.identifier.contextkey7690524
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5930
dc.description.abstractBecause agency enforcement of the Medicaid statute against non-compliant states is utterly impractical, Medicaid providers and beneficiaries have relied on § 1983 litigation to protect themselves against the harmful effects of state cutbacks on Medicaid spending by privately enforcing two particular provisions of the Medicaid statute against the states. However, because of several legislative and judicial decisions, private litigants can no longer use these provisions to challenge low Medicaid reimbursement rates. This Note proposes and evaluates an alternative method of resisting state Medicaid spending cutbacks: enforcing the Reasonable Promptness Provision of the Medicaid statute through § 1983.
dc.titleIn the Nick of Time: Using the Reasonable Promptness Provision to Challenge Medicaid Spending Cutbacks
dc.source.journaltitleYale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:51:33Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol15/iss2/3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=yjhple&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Chen_2.pdf
Size:
1.511Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record