Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordon, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:37Z
dc.date.issued1984-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1368
dc.identifier.contextkey1721440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/585
dc.description.abstractCritical legal writers pay a lot of attention to history. In fact, they have probably devoted more pages to historical description - particularly the intellectual history of legal doctrine - than to anything else, even law and economics. Such a preoccupation within a radical movement is at first glance surprising. After all, lawyers have, by notorious custom, used history conservatively, appealing to continuity and tradition. And in the less common situations in which lawyers have used history to criticize the status quo, they have usually resorted to social and economic history, to show that the original social context of a legal rule reveals that it was adopted for wicked or obsolete reasons, rather than to the history of legal doctrine. What could conceivably be radical - or, as some unkindly ask, even interesting - about rewriting the history of doctrine?
dc.titleCritical Legal Histories
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:37Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1368
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2361&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Critical_Legal_Histories.pdf
Size:
4.400Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record