Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordon, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:35:36Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:35:36Z
dc.date.issued1987-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/1363
dc.identifier.contextkey1721970
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/580
dc.description.abstractCritical Legal Studies continues to flourish despite persistent criticism concerning its goals and aims. In the lecture reproduced below, Professor Gordon demonstrates why such global criticism is not only harmless but irrevelant to the central message of the movement. Borrowing from the growing body of CLS scholarship, he illustrates, through example, that the most valuable contributions of CLS are essentially local in nature. But these predominantly local critiques, he explains, can be readily extended to new areas in order to destory the seemingly necessary connection between the way our law is and the way it must be.
dc.titleUnfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches to Law
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:35:36Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1363
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2366&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Unfreezing.pdf
Size:
1.782Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record